Flat Earth

200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball

1) The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees 
around the observer regardless of altitude. All amateur 
balloon, rocket, plane and drone footage show a completely 
flat horizon over 20+ miles high. Only NASA and other 
government “space agencies” show curvature in their fake 
CGI photos/videos. 

2) The horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer 
as altitude is gained, so you never have to look down to see 
it. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as you 
ascended the horizon would stay fixed and the observer / 
camera would have to tilt looking down further and further 
to see it. 

3) The natural physics of water is to find and maintain its 
level. If Earth were a giant sphere tilted, wobbling and 
hurdling through infinite space then truly flat, consistently 
level surfaces would not exist here. But since Earth is in fact 
an extended flat plane, this fundamental physical property of 
fluids finding and remaining level is consistent with 
experience and common sense. 

4) Rivers run down to sea-level finding the easiest course, 
North, South, East, West and all other intermediary 
directions over the Earth at the same time. If Earth were 
truly a spinning ball then many of these rivers would be 
impossibly flowing uphill, for example the Mississippi in its 
3000 miles would have to ascend 1 1 miles before reaching 
the Gulf of Mexico. 

5) One portion of the Nile River flows for a thousand miles 
with a fall of only one foot. Parts of the West African 
Congo, according to the supposed inclination and movement 
of the ball-Earth, would be sometimes running uphill and 
sometimes down. This would also be the case for the 
Parana, Paraguay and other long rivers. 

6) If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference as 
NASA and modern astronomy claim, spherical trigonometry 
dictates the surface of all standing water must curve 
downward an easily measurable 8 inches per mile multiplied 
by the square of the distance. This means along a 6 mile 
channel of standing water, the Earth would dip 6 feet on 
either end from the central peak. Every time such 
experiments have been conducted, however, standing water 
has proven to be perfectly level. 

7) Surveyors, engineers and architects are never required to 
factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their projects. 
Canals, railways, bridges and tunnels for example are 
always cut and laid horizontally, often over hundreds of 
miles without any allowance for curvature. 

8) The Suez Canal connecting the Mediterranean with the 
Red Sea is 100 miles long without any locks making the 
water an uninterrupted continuation of the two seas. When 
constructed, the Earth’s supposed curvature was not taken 
into account, it was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 
feet below sea-level, passing through several lakes from one 
sea to the other, with the datum line and water’s surface 
running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles. 

9 ) Engineer, W. Winckler was published in the Earth 
Review regarding the Earth’s supposed curvature, stating, 

“ As an engineer of many years standing , I saw that this 
absurd allowance is only permitted in school books. No 
engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind. I 
have projected many miles of railways and many more of 
canals and the allowance has not even been thought of 
much less allowed for. This allowance for curvature means 
this - that it is 8 ” for the first mile of a canal, and increasing 
at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles; thus a 
small navigable canal for boats, say 30 miles long, will 
have, by the above rule an allowance for curvature of 600 
feet. Think of that and then please credit engineers as not 
being quite such fools. Nothing of the sort is allowed. We 
no more think of allowing 600 feet for a line of 30 miles of 
railway or canal, than of wasting our time trying to square 
the circle ” 

10) The London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight 
line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool. The 
railroad’s highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is 
only 240 feet above sea-level. If the world were actually a 
globe, however, curving 8 inches per mile squared, the 1 80 
mile stretch of rail would form an arc with the center point 
at Birmingham raising over a mile, a full 5,400 feet above 
London and Liverpool. 

11 ) A surveyor and engineer of thirty years published in the 
Birmingham Weekly Mercury stated, “I am thoroughly 
acquainted with the theory and practice of civil engineering. 
However bigoted some of our professors may be in the 
theory of surveying according to the prescribed rules, yet it 
is well known amongst us that such theoretical 
ILLUSTRATION. All our locomotives are designed to run 
on what may be regarded as TRUE LEVELS or FLATS. 
There are, of course, partial inclines or gradients here and 
there, but they are always accurately defined and must be 
carefully traversed. But anything approaching to eight 
inches in the mile, increasing as the square of the distance, 
EVER YET CONSTRUCTED. Taking one station with 
another all over England and Scotland, it may be stated that 
all the platforms are ON THE SAME RELATIVE LEVEL. 

The distance between Eastern and Western coasts of 
England may be set down as 300 miles. If the prescribed 
curvature was indeed as represented, the central stations at 
Rugby or Warwick ought to be close upon three miles higher 
than a chord drawn from the two extremities. If such was 
the case there is not a driver or stoker within the Kingdom 
that would be found to take charge of the train. We can only 
laugh at those of your readers who seriously give us credit 
for such venturesome exploits, as running trains round 
spherical curves. Horizontal curves on levels are dangerous 
enough, vertical curves would be a thousand times worse, 
and with our rolling stock constructed as at present 
physically impossible 

12 ) The Manchester Ship Canal Company published in the 
Earth Review stated, “It is customary in Railway and Canal 
constructions for all levels to be referred to a datum which 
is nominally horizontal and is so shown on all sections. It is 

not the practice in laying out Public Works to make 
allowances for the curvature of the earth 

13 ) In a 19th century Lrench experiment by M. M. Biot and 
Arago a powerful lamp with good reflectors was placed on 
the summit of Desierto las Palmas in Spain and able to be 
seen ah the way from Camprey on the Island of Iviza. Since 
the elevation of the two points were identical and the 
distance between covered nearly 100 miles, if Earth were a 
ball 25,000 miles in circumference, the light should have 
been more than 6600 feet, a mile and a quarter, below the 
line of sight! 

14) The Lieutenant-Colonel Portlock experiment used oxy- 
hydrogen Drummond’s lights and heliostats to reflect the 
sun’s rays across stations set up across 108 miles of St. 
George’s Channel. If the Earth were actually a ball 25,000 
miles in circumference, Portlock’ s light should have 
remained hidden under a mile and a half of curvature. 

15) If the Earth were truly a sphere 25,000 miles in 
circumference, airplane pilots would have to constantly 
correct their altitudes downwards so as to not fly straight off 
into “outer space;” a pilot wishing to simply maintain their 
altitude at a typical cruising speed of 500 mph, would have 
to constantly dip their nose downwards and descend 2,777 
feet (over half a mile) every minute! Otherwise, without 
compensation, in one hour’s time the pilot would find 
themselves 31.5 miles higher than expected. 

16) The experiment known as “Airy’s Failure” proved that 
the stars move relative to a stationary Earth and not the other 
way around. By first filling a telescope with water to slow 
down the speed of light inside, then calculating the tilt 
necessary to get the starlight directly down the tube, Airy 
failed to prove the heliocentric theory since the starlight was 
already coming in the correct angle with no change 
necessary, and instead proved the geocentric model correct. 

17) “Olber’s Paradox” states that if there were billions of 
stars which are suns the night sky would be filled 
completely with light. As Edgar Allen Poe said, “ Were the 
succession of stars endless, then the background of the sky 
would present us a uniform luminosity, since there could 
exist absolutely no point, in all that background, at which 
would not exist a star .” In fact Olber’s “Paradox” is no 
more a paradox than George Airy’s experiment was a 
“failure.” Both are actually excellent refutations of the 
heliocentric spinning ball model. [continue reading]

Leave a Reply